During recent public discussions concerning a doctoral dissertation defended in 2015 by M. Sinkevičius at the ISM Economics and Management University, questions have arisen regarding the academic integrity of the unpublished work. Addressing these claims, the individual stated that the research process was rigorous and sustained over a period of four years, rather than being compiled rapidly.
The speaker emphasized that the academic institution employed specific protocols to verify originality. They noted that in 2015, ISM utilized programs, such as “Turnitin,” designed to compare the submitted material against existing databases, thereby examining potential vulnerabilities related to ethics and plagiarism. According to the account, no concerns or comments were raised regarding the submission during the defense in 2015.
Based on these established procedures, the individual expressed confidence in the originality of the material. They affirmed that the work was prepared ethically and properly, maintaining that there was no instance of plagiarism. The defense of the research, therefore, is viewed as having met all institutional standards at the time of completion.
In response to the ongoing public discourse, the speaker reiterated a sense of reassurance regarding the academic standing of the thesis. They stated they remain completely calm regarding the matter, trusting the established verification processes that confirmed the integrity of the submitted research.
Topics: #work #calm #plagiarism
