After the speech, S. Skvernelis announced: he will refer to the ECHR (4) regarding the statements of G. Nausėda and other politicians

A member of the Seimas stated in an interview with the Delfi portal that while the matter at hand is not inherently a political case, it has developed significant political dimensions that warrant discussion. The speaker clarified that the current focus is not intended to critique the Lithuanian legal system itself. Instead, preparations are underway to file a complaint with the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR), where specific facts will be presented for review.

As an illustration of the issues, the Seimas member highlighted instances of public comments made by the President of the Republic. These comments, according to the official, are assessed as exerting undue pressure on both the general public and law enforcement agencies. The discussion specifically addressed the public statements made by the President regarding searches conducted and the information subsequently provided to officers.

Furthermore, the member noted that discussions covered the forthcoming plans shared during a conversation with the new chairman of the Democratic Union “For the sake of Lithuania.”

The official emphasized that these concerns are based on documented instances, citing only one example so far, but confirming the existence of several others. The overall assertion is that certain public statements have created an environment of pressure, necessitating international legal review via the ECHR. The core argument revolves around establishing facts that demonstrate a pattern of influence that the speaker believes must be addressed outside the immediate domestic legal framework.

Topics: #echr #statements #not

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *