The individual in question, who was previously associated with “Portal’s knowledge,” subsequently became a member of VRK. Despite this affiliation, she refrained from publicly detailing the specific services she provided to the political group, nor did she withdraw from ongoing discussions concerning related issues. When questioned regarding whether the party had compensated her for these services, L.
Matjošaitytė declined to release the information. She cited professional secrecy as the basis for her refusal, stating that such professional activity information is legally protected. She informed “Delfi” that disclosing such details is contrary to law, making comment impossible.
Matjošaitytė also addressed the violation concerning the “Nemuno aušra” law, although her presented arguments did not achieve universal consensus. Nevertheless, she strongly emphasized that her capacity as an independent member of VRK imposes no limitations on her autonomy. She asserted, “As an independent member of VRK, I have no obligations that would limit my actions or freedom of decision.” The emphasis remained on her professional independence despite her status as a member of the organization.
Topics: #information #became #member
