Politician A. Širinskienė stated that procedural irregularities concerning the drafting and registration of a key government document warrant review by the Constitutional Court. Speaking on the “ELTA Weekend” television program, Širinskienė expressed concern over the established process, arguing that the manner in which the document was handled did not align with established legal standards.
She specifically criticized the sequence of events, pointing out that the draft of the government program was reportedly registered by an entity that she characterized as non-existent. Furthermore, she highlighted a procedural anomaly where the program was registered prior to the official decree that names the relevant ministers. Širinskienė emphasized that such operational gaps should not occur within a legally sound state framework.
Given these discrepancies, Širinskienė suggested that the Constitutional Court should intervene to assess the overall situation. She noted that the current ambiguity surrounding the process has led to multiple differing interpretations among legal experts. Consequently, she indicated that a formal evaluation by the CC would be beneficial to clarify the correct legal order and resolve the existing uncertainty.
Her comments focused on ensuring that the procedural integrity of the government’s actions is upheld according to established constitutional guidelines.
Topics: #government #program #situation
