During a recent search conducted at a house located in Palanga, the presence of Ž. Pinskuvienė was confirmed, leading to intervention from her legal representative, Jovitas Elzenbergas. Addressing the situation, the lawyer raised several formal objections concerning the methods employed by the investigating officials.
Specifically, Elzenbergas questioned the procedure by which the daughter of Ž. Pinskuvienė’s mobile phone was transferred from Vilnius to Palanga. He stated that this device was utilized in connection with gaining access to the property.
Furthermore, the lawyer emphasized a critical procedural point: that Ž. Pinskuvienė’s daughter currently holds no formal procedural status within the ongoing pre-trial investigation. The legal representative indicated his intent to challenge the actions taken by the law enforcement agencies.
He announced that he would be filing a formal complaint against the conduct of the police investigation in court. The broader context of the investigation involves the circumstances surrounding the acquisition of the aforementioned house and related matters. The legal dispute centers on the adherence to proper investigative protocols during the search in Palanga.
The lawyer’s immediate focus remains on challenging the legality of evidence collection and the status of non-primary parties involved in the proceedings, signaling a direct legal confrontation with the investigating authorities.
Topics: #house #palanga #lawyer
