V. Sinkevičius stated on the “ELTA corner” show that an investigation should proceed, though he expressed reservations regarding the forum for such an inquiry. Specifically, he questioned whether a parliamentary investigation would be appropriate, citing the potential for such proceedings to function as a political mechanism for settling scores.
Instead, Sinkevičius suggested that a dialogue involving all parliamentary parties—both the governing coalition and the opposition—should take place. This discussion, he argued, should focus on defining the scope and formulating the precise questions for the investigation. He emphasized that the current situation, characterized by only fragmented information, fails to address the core issues.
According to Sinkevičius, this lack of clarity negatively impacts the perception of the state’s processes as a whole. Furthermore, he noted that information fragmentation creates an environment susceptible to speculation. This susceptibility allows conspiracy theories and foreign propaganda to draw conclusions that may lack factual basis, making it difficult to definitively disprove such claims due to the very nature of the dispersed information.
Therefore, establishing a consensus among parties regarding the scope and questions for the investigation was deemed crucial for maintaining transparency and stability.
Topics: #investigation #questions #parliamentary
