S. Malinauskas recently issued strong criticisms regarding the performance and integrity of the VTPSI, suggesting the institution negatively impacts Lithuania. In his statements, Malinauskas alleged that the VTPSI has a pattern of avoiding necessary inspections until the issue gains significant media coverage.
The criticisms extend to the VTPSI’s perceived connections with both business interests and political figures. Malinauskas cited specific instances to support his claims of inaction. He referenced past situations, such as an inspection concerning the President’s fence, suggesting that the body failed to act despite obvious violations and prior reports.
Furthermore, he pointed to an alleged case involving a multi-apartment building near Tauro Hill, where he claimed the inspection office delayed responding to complaints from local residents for an extended period. Beyond these specific examples, Malinauskas raised broader concerns about potential misconduct within the agency, alluding to allegations of corruption and improper conduct among its employees. He noted that these concerns have been raised with him multiple times through various channels.
In summary, Malinauskas characterized the VTPSI as an entity that has become more than just an administrative office. His critique frames the body as having a history of questionable oversight, suggesting that its operational effectiveness and impartiality within Lithuania are subject to serious public scrutiny.
Topics: #malinauskas #lithuania #vtpsi
S. Malinauskas recently criticized the performance and integrity of the VTPSI, stating that the institution negatively affects Lithuania. In his remarks, Malinauskas alleged that the VTPSI has a tende