Laurynas Kasčiūnas, the leader of the Homeland Union-Christian Democrats, stated that the opposition had urged the president not to sign the legislation. He noted that given the circumstances, the party was unsurprised by the final decision of the president. Kasčiūnas announced that the matter would now proceed to the Constitutional Court.
He confirmed that his party was preparing the necessary documentation, anticipating filing the appeal either by the end of the coming week or the beginning of the following week, adding that they would secure the required signatures. In a related discussion, Viktorija Čmilytė-Nielsen, the leader of the Liberal Alliance, offered a different interpretation of the president’s action. She suggested that the signing of the project might represent an effort by the president to mitigate potential disagreements with the Social Democrats.
According to Čmilytė-Nielsen, the president had an opportunity to adopt a firmer stance. Both statements underscore a significant political division regarding the recently signed legislation. While one faction views the legal challenge as a necessary constitutional step following the president’s final choice, another questions the underlying political motivations behind the president’s decision to sign the bill, suggesting the move was calculated rather than definitive.
The focus remains on the impending legal review process initiated by the opposition.
Topics: #not #president #choice
The opposition intends to appeal the amendments to the LRT following the President’s signature. Laurynas Kasčiūnas, leader of the Homeland Union-Christian Democrats, stated that the opposition had adv